Abstract
Introduction: Most of the laboratory errors occur at the pre analytical phase (70%), emphasizing the need to acquire or apply more accurate method to solve and classify possible traps in this basic stage of the laboratory work1. Most of the problems in pre analytical phase is related to the factors (especially hemolysis) are associated with sample collection immediately. Causes of pre analytical hemolysis are associated with sample collection, inappropriate transportation methods, extreme temperature, sample handling, delayed processing and prolonged storage2. Hemolysis can notably effect the reliability of test. Vascular access devices such as catheters and needles may lead to cell lysis by exerting shear forces across the blood stream, Components from blood collection tubes such as stoppers, lubricants, surfactant and separating gels can leak into samples and / or adsorb analytes from the sample. Special tube additives can also change analytic stability. Due to these interactions with blood samples, blood collection sets are a potential source of pre analytical errors in laboratory tests2.Therefore, selection of device for blood collection becomes the most important consideration in optimizing the pre analytical phase and achieving consistent results. While the main determinants have preanalytical interchange ability, the blood collection technique has a significant impact on the reliability of laboratory test results. The butterfly collection set, which is a small needle attached to the elastic plastic wings and connected with an extension flexible tube, can be considered a reliable alternative to the classic straight needle for collecting blood in selected patient groups. In fact, an adapter can simply be attached so that it can fit into a vacuum needle holder and a vacuum system3.
Objectives: Choosing the right device for blood collection is an issue that is frequently encountered in laboratory. The purpose of this study was to compare the quality of the samples collected in terms of reduction in blood sample errors.
Materials and Methods: This Hospital based prospective study was conducted in Apollo BGS hospital Mysore. Blood samples were drawn from the 100 patients in ER and day care. A total of 100 patients and 156 blood samples were considered for the study.100 Patients who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study.
Results: The total number of blood sample errors was decreased from 4% to 0.1%. There was significant reduction in blood sample errors. Significant difference was found out with respect to visual hemolysis and tube filling speed and pain intensity between the devices.
Conclusion: our findings demonstrate that Therefore, selection of device for blood collection becomes the most important consideration in optimizing the pre analytical phase and achieving consistent results.